|
Functional Area
|
Inadequate
(D)
|
Adequate
(C)
|
Good
(B)
|
Excellent
(A)
|
|
Complete project for the client
|
Solution is not fully functional
|
Lack of testing or user documentation in solution.
|
Solution usable by client. Project plan created and completed.
|
Solution addresses changing client demands. Solution in face of adversity.
|
|
Communication with client
|
Group only meets with client at start and end of project.
|
Lack of understanding of client needs. Unable to work with client’s busy schedule.
|
Fail to control client’s excess demands. Communications with clients well planned and documented.
|
Client understood and understands. Good communication with difficult client.
|
|
Communication with instructor
|
Group only emails instructor a couple of times and only stops by when there is a big problem.
|
Entire group missing at some staff meetings, monthly reports, or meetings with instructor.
|
Most of group attends all staff meetings, weekly reports to instructor on project.
|
Entire group attends all staff meetings, weekly meetings with instructor on project
|
|
Group synergy
|
No appreciation of different members’ abilities. Members drop out of group.
|
No clear leadership or organization. Some members do most of the work.
|
Good methods of communication developed. Respect of members.
|
Draw on strengths of each member and all feel valuable.
|
|
Documentation deliverables
|
Documents prepared in unprofessional way --limited in size and scope.
|
Documents closer to student paper than business deliverables. Some documents lacking.
|
Most sections of documents well written.
|
Professional documentation organized in repository or folder.
|
|
Final Presentation
|
No presentation
|
Poor presentation, no slides.
|
Good slides, good description of work objectives.
|
Excellent slides, good contact with audience, professional presentation.
|